The early history of postal censorshich in Mrugkong
Minuli on 27126.om is given in my minuti on
*
which paper we
were affrised (In the pist
him I think) that the right to censor
Kawit muile has now been
established.
generally
On that pafer we referred the question of censor neutine mails the inttryking to 1.0 % reireerd the question generally, & ushed whether recised general instinction should be
seat out.
7.0
ally
agreed as regards toughing - 30449, 8 we lete graphed to the Gove on that paper that all tauit mails on which corr: likely to assist encing might be found should be censored. but N.K. 7.0.specially deprecated our Lusking instructives of a general nature, reference to the 2.0. opicion_
reynd
I made ro
? We should litegraphe to Gor with ref: to over- til: on 30449 on the lives of paras 2-5
of
this letter,
and unde copy to 7.0. pointing out that forherif so
allentin has not previously bese decoctid to the 2.0 litter of the 2004 of Harch, that no copy has wee bee seat to us; Dexplain that in matters
connected with portal setgraphene cevrontig
the soft has been guided of the weather of the 4.0, Adus. & 7.0, & invite special reference to our litter of the 21st of June 27126 & to thir
8
refly in which they deprecated any geunch instructions for increasing the censorting, & cash whether the soft is to understand that they still adhere to those views both as regards the Eastern Cole other than Kryking &
as regards the Cols genually.
[7.0. blame the W.0 for not sending
is the 2.0. opicciors. I don't kew coks is in fault, but it is ver
blassing making a pass. Noth
defli are overtershed garnight's an cinecitable from time to time].
I su
T.CH.
29.7.157.
}
apss
Arc
21.7
aloxéo
Th
28.2.15-
papers that
on
su m
tuning up an
Wo. uford to the 2.0. Minin
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.